IRVH vs. PXI
IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRVH is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while PXI is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. IRVH is actively managed, while PXI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRVH returned 0.36%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for PXI. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IRVH charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PXI.
Performance
IRVH vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRVH achieves a -4.22% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 26.12% return.
IRVH
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -4.22%
- 1Y
- -2.61%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PXI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 21.43%
- YTD
- 26.12%
- 1Y
- 30.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
IRVH vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -4.22% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 26.12% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 24.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRVH and PXI is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRVH vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
IRVH
PXI
IRVH vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRVH | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 2.53 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 6.90 | -7.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRVH vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRVH drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRVH and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRVH | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -85.08% | +70.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.11% | -12.40% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.03% | -30.74% | +22.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -79.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.14% | -8.12% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.74% | -29.33% | +19.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 4.54% | -1.64% |
Volatility
IRVH vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is 1.17%, while Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that IRVH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRVH | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 7.20% | -6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.38% | 17.45% | -14.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 22.26% | -17.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 33.23% | -24.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.76% | 37.02% | -28.26% |
IRVH vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRVH has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PXI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRVH vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
IRVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than PXI's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.65% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.30% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRVH and PXI have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXI has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to IRVH (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRVH dropped -14.98% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 3-year performance, PXI leads with 12.92% vs 0.36% for IRVH. On fees, IRVH is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PXI has performed better with a 12.92% return vs 0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IRVH is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PXI.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 1.30% for PXI.
IRVH is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while PXI is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IRVH and 0.60% for PXI.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRVH and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer