IRONX vs. PPFIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX).

IRONX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 14, 2010. PPFIX is managed by Princeton. It was launched on Nov 15, 2016.

Performance

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IRONX Ironclad Managed Risk Fund	-4.38%	10.57%	14.78%	10.61%	0.26%	13.24%	5.91%	458.33%	1.99%	3.13%
PPFIX Princeton Premium Fund	1.35%	7.45%	4.29%	7.54%	1.84%	14.93%	3.32%	8.75%	-5.38%	10.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRONX achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than PPFIX's 1.35% return.

IRONX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: -4.38%
• 6M: -3.46%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: 25.71%

PPFIX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 3.55%
• 1Y: 6.90%
• 3Y*: 6.32%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRONX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFIX's 1.95% expense ratio.

PPFIX

Princeton Premium Fund

IRONX

Ironclad Managed Risk Fund

Return for Risk

IRONX vs. PPFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRONX

IRONX Risk / Return Rank: 27
IRONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
IRONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
IRONX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
IRONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IRONX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PPFIX

PPFIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PPFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PPFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PPFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PPFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PPFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRONX	PPFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	1.66	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	2.04	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	2.34	-1.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.70	1.90	-1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.08	14.59	-11.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRONX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the PPFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRONX and PPFIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRONX	PPFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	1.66	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	1.57	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.80	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between IRONX and PPFIX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Dividend Comparison

IRONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PPFIX's 5.62% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IRONX Ironclad Managed Risk Fund	0.06%	0.06%	0.19%	5.17%	2.97%	13.84%	4.16%	121.75%	8.85%	9.93%	1.42%	0.38%
PPFIX Princeton Premium Fund	5.62%	5.62%	6.24%	6.86%	1.92%	7.16%	0.44%	0.23%	0.93%	2.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRONX drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, smaller than the maximum PPFIX drawdown of -15.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRONX and PPFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRONX	PPFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.71%	-15.64%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-2.77%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.68%	-4.49%	-7.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.92%	-0.07%	-5.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-1.37%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	0.47%	+1.50%

Volatility

IRONX vs. PPFIX - Volatility Comparison

Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Princeton Premium Fund (PPFIX) at 0.33%. This indicates that IRONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRONX	PPFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	0.33%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.40%	0.67%	+5.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.62%	3.59%	+8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.40%	3.87%	+5.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.74%	7.18%	+33.56%