IRONX vs. MTBA
IRONX (Ironclad Managed Risk Fund) and MTBA (Simplify MBS ETF) are both funds - IRONX is a Options Trading fund managed by BlackRock, while MTBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past year, IRONX returned 15.41% vs 5.28% for MTBA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IRONX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTBA.
Performance
IRONX vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRONX achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.10% return.
IRONX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 26.85%
MTBA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRONX vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IRONX Ironclad Managed Risk Fund | 5.49% | 10.57% | 14.78% | 4.82% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | -0.10% | 7.74% | 1.99% | 3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRONX and MTBA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between IRONX and MTBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRONX vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank
IRONX
MTBA
IRONX vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRONX | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.71 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.43 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.81 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | 6.24 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRONX | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.71 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.31 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
IRONX vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRONX drawdown since its inception was -13.71%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRONX and MTBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRONX | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.71% | -3.48% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -2.82% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -0.79% | -0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 0.82% | +0.78% |
Volatility
IRONX vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison
Ironclad Managed Risk Fund (IRONX) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 1.36%. This indicates that IRONX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRONX | MTBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 1.36% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | 2.48% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.15% | 3.10% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.45% | 3.96% | +5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 3.96% | +36.80% |
IRONX vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRONX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRONX vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison
IRONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRONX Ironclad Managed Risk Fund | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.19% | 5.17% | 2.97% | 13.84% | 4.16% | 121.75% | 8.85% | 9.93% | 1.42% | 0.38% |
MTBA Simplify MBS ETF | 6.08% | 5.98% | 6.03% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRONX and MTBA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRONX has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to MTBA (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRONX dropped -13.71% vs MTBA's -3.48%.
IRONX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRONX and MTBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer