IROC vs. SPHQ
IROC (Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IROC is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. IROC is actively managed, while SPHQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IROC returned 5.21%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPHQ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IROC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
IROC vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IROC achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 13.62% return.
IROC
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 7.23%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 20.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.79%
IROC vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IROC Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF | 2.86% | 4.13% | 4.69% | 5.97% | -0.88% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 13.62% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IROC and SPHQ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IROC vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
IROC
SPHQ
IROC vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF (IROC) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IROC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.29 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.42 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.87 | 10.27 | -0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IROC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.68 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.38 | 0.53 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
IROC vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IROC drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IROC and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IROC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -57.83% | +53.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.64% | -8.90% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.79% | -16.57% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -2.19% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -10.70% | +9.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 2.09% | -1.36% |
Volatility
IROC vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF (IROC) is 0.95%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that IROC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IROC | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 4.03% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.34% | 10.44% | -8.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.03% | 12.83% | -9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.50% | 16.47% | -12.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.50% | 17.87% | -14.37% |
IROC vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IROC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IROC vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
IROC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than SPHQ's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IROC Invesco Rochester High Yield Municipal ETF | 5.11% | 4.79% | 4.08% | 3.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.06% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IROC and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to IROC (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IROC dropped -4.79% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 3-year performance, SPHQ leads with 21.90% vs 5.21% for IROC. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IROC has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IROC.
IROC has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 1.06% for SPHQ.
IROC is categorized as High Yield Muni, while SPHQ is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IROC and 0.15% for SPHQ.
IROC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IROC and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer