PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IROB.DE achieves a 28.27% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDT.DE's 24.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IROB.DE has underperformed ZPDT.DE with an annualized return of 13.49%, while ZPDT.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.05% annualized return.


IROB.DE

1D
-1.49%
1M
6.54%
YTD
28.27%
6M
25.45%
1Y
53.74%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
13.49%

ZPDT.DE

1D
-2.28%
1M
11.72%
YTD
24.09%
6M
22.52%
1Y
48.51%
3Y*
26.33%
5Y*
22.38%
10Y*
24.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IROB.DE
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
28.27%10.23%4.18%20.94%-30.08%26.20%31.63%33.76%-17.78%28.83%
ZPDT.DE
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
24.09%11.31%29.30%52.02%-25.52%47.48%30.46%53.58%1.75%17.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IROB.DE and ZPDT.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.77

The correlation between IROB.DE and ZPDT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IROB.DE
IROB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IROB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDT.DE
ZPDT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) and SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IROB.DEZPDT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

3.19

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

8.35

+6.67

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IROB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the ZPDT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IROB.DE and ZPDT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IROB.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.43

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.99

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

1.12

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.03

-0.46

Drawdowns

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IROB.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than ZPDT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IROB.DE and ZPDT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IROB.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-31.48%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-15.47%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.95%

-29.50%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.52%

-29.50%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.52%

-31.48%

-5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-3.09%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.47%

-5.68%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

5.91%

-2.31%

Volatility

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (IROB.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDT.DE) at 7.06%. This indicates that IROB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPDT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IROB.DEZPDT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

7.06%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.66%

14.78%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

20.30%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

22.33%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

21.38%

-0.37%

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IROB.DE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDT.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IROB.DE vs. ZPDT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IROB.DE nor ZPDT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IROB.DE and ZPDT.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDT.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDT.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IROB.DE.

IROB.DE tracks ROBO-STOX® Global Robotics and Automation, while ZPDT.DE tracks S&P Technology Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for IROB.DE and 0.15% for ZPDT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IROB.DE and ZPDT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer