PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRM vs. CPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IRM vs. CPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, IRM has outperformed CPT with an annualized return of 19.57%, while CPT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


IRM

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
55.51%
6M
54.66%
1Y
32.49%
3Y*
36.93%
5Y*
27.93%
10Y*
19.57%

CPT

1D
2.63%
1M
4.32%
YTD
0.00%
6M
5.33%
1Y
-3.70%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRM vs. CPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
55.51%-18.24%54.48%46.52%-0.08%87.74%0.98%5.87%-7.97%23.56%
CPT
Camden Property Trust
0.00%-1.48%21.31%-7.64%-35.58%83.40%-2.28%24.21%-0.98%13.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IRM and CPT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 1996

0.35

The correlation between IRM and CPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IRM:

$38.24B

CPT:

$11.42B

EPS

IRM:

$0.91

CPT:

$3.60

PE Ratio

IRM:

139.85

CPT:

30.27

PS Ratio

IRM:

5.26

CPT:

9.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

IRM:

$7.25B

CPT:

$1.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IRM:

$2.94B

CPT:

$725.73M

EBITDA (TTM)

IRM:

$2.40B

CPT:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRM vs. CPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRM
IRM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CPT
CPT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRM vs. CPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRMCPTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.98

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

-0.23

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.12

-0.43

+3.55

IRM vs. CPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRM Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the CPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRM and CPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRMCPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

-0.19

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.00

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.29

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Drawdowns

IRM vs. CPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRM drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, smaller than the maximum CPT drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRM and CPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRMCPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.71%

-75.31%

+19.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.15%

-16.05%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.03%

-24.87%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.03%

-50.22%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.03%

-50.22%

+11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-28.89%

+25.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-12.90%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.43%

8.58%

+1.85%

Volatility

IRM vs. CPT - Volatility Comparison

Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Camden Property Trust (CPT) at 4.64%. This indicates that IRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRMCPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

4.64%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

14.04%

+9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.50%

19.19%

+12.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.59%

22.67%

+6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.59%

24.36%

+5.23%

Dividends

IRM vs. CPT - Dividend Comparison

IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than CPT's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPT
Camden Property Trust
3.87%3.82%3.55%4.03%3.36%1.93%3.32%3.02%3.50%3.26%8.62%3.65%
IRM
Iron Mountain Incorporated
2.58%3.88%2.60%3.63%4.96%4.73%8.39%7.69%7.32%5.93%6.17%7.07%

Financials

IRM vs. CPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iron Mountain Incorporated and Camden Property Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.94B
0
(IRM) Total Revenue
(CPT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IRM and CPT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRM has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to CPT (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRM dropped -55.71% vs CPT's -75.31%.

IRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRM and CPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer