IRM vs. CPT
IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) and CPT (Camden Property Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — IRM in REIT - Specialty, CPT in REIT - Residential. Over the past 10 years, IRM returned 19.80%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for CPT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IRM vs. CPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRM achieves a 62.82% return, which is significantly higher than CPT's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, IRM has outperformed CPT with an annualized return of 19.80%, while CPT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.
IRM
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- YTD
- 62.82%
- 6M
- 67.16%
- 1Y
- 33.52%
- 3Y*
- 39.60%
- 5Y*
- 30.12%
- 10Y*
- 19.80%
CPT
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- -1.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
IRM vs. CPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 62.82% | -18.24% | 54.48% | 46.52% | -0.08% | 87.74% | 0.98% | 5.87% | -7.97% | 23.56% |
CPT Camden Property Trust | 1.48% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRM and CPT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1996 | 0.35 |
The correlation between IRM and CPT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IRM:
$39.76B
CPT:
$11.59B
IRM:
$0.91
CPT:
$3.60
IRM:
145.44
CPT:
30.71
IRM:
5.47
CPT:
10.08
IRM:
$7.25B
CPT:
$1.18B
IRM:
$2.94B
CPT:
$725.73M
IRM:
$2.40B
CPT:
$1.12B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRM vs. CPT — Risk / Return Rank
IRM
CPT
IRM vs. CPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.01 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.07 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | -0.14 | +3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRM vs. CPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRM drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, smaller than the maximum CPT drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRM and CPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.71% | -75.31% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.15% | -14.81% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.03% | -24.87% | -14.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.03% | -50.22% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.03% | -50.22% | +11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.84% | +27.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.15% | -12.92% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.48% | 7.41% | +3.07% |
Volatility
IRM vs. CPT - Volatility Comparison
Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Camden Property Trust (CPT) at 6.10%. This indicates that IRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 6.10% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.41% | 14.32% | +9.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.25% | 19.60% | +12.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.67% | 22.73% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 24.40% | +5.28% |
Dividends
IRM vs. CPT - Dividend Comparison
IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than CPT's 3.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPT Camden Property Trust | 3.81% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 2.54% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.32% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% |
Financials
IRM vs. CPT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iron Mountain Incorporated and Camden Property Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IRM and CPT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IRM has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to CPT (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRM dropped -55.71% vs CPT's -75.31%.
IRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IRM and CPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer