IRM vs. CPT
Compare and contrast key facts about Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Camden Property Trust (CPT).
Performance
IRM vs. CPT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IRM vs. CPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 24.14% | -18.24% | 54.48% | 46.52% | -0.08% | 87.74% | 0.98% | 5.87% | -7.97% | 23.56% |
CPT Camden Property Trust | -10.31% | -1.48% | 21.31% | -7.64% | -35.58% | 83.40% | -2.28% | 24.21% | -0.98% | 13.33% |
Fundamentals
IRM:
$30.48B
CPT:
$10.61B
IRM:
$0.49
CPT:
$3.53
IRM:
209.97
CPT:
27.65
IRM:
4.40
CPT:
8.99
IRM:
$6.90B
CPT:
$1.18B
IRM:
$3.82B
CPT:
$723.23M
IRM:
$2.20B
CPT:
$1.11B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRM achieves a 24.14% return, which is significantly higher than CPT's -10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IRM has outperformed CPT with an annualized return of 18.42%, while CPT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.60% annualized return.
IRM
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- 24.14%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 22.87%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 27.35%
- 10Y*
- 18.42%
CPT
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -8.87%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 6M
- -6.61%
- 1Y
- -16.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRM vs. CPT — Risk / Return Rank
IRM
CPT
IRM vs. CPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Camden Property Trust (CPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | -0.78 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | -0.99 | +2.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.88 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | -0.85 | +1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | -1.49 | +3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | -0.78 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.04 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.23 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between IRM and CPT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
IRM vs. CPT - Dividend Comparison
IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than CPT's 4.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated | 3.23% | 3.88% | 2.60% | 3.63% | 4.96% | 4.73% | 8.39% | 7.69% | 7.32% | 5.93% | 6.17% | 7.07% |
CPT Camden Property Trust | 4.31% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.03% | 3.36% | 1.93% | 3.32% | 3.02% | 3.50% | 3.26% | 8.62% | 3.65% |
Drawdowns
IRM vs. CPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRM drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, smaller than the maximum CPT drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRM and CPT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.71% | -75.31% | +19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.15% | -19.00% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.03% | -50.22% | +11.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.03% | -50.22% | +11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.21% | -36.22% | +20.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.21% | -12.80% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 10.82% | -0.35% |
Volatility
IRM vs. CPT - Volatility Comparison
Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to Camden Property Trust (CPT) at 4.67%. This indicates that IRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IRM | CPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 4.67% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.37% | 13.60% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.70% | 21.80% | +10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 22.56% | +6.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 24.33% | +4.98% |
Financials
IRM vs. CPT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Iron Mountain Incorporated and Camden Property Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities