IRM vs. BOTZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IRM (Iron Mountain Incorporated) is a stock, while BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Over the past 5 years, IRM returned 27.45%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BOTZ. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IRM vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRM achieves a 54.64% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 2.46% return.

IRM

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 54.64%
• 6M: 55.51%
• 1Y: 28.47%
• 3Y*: 35.74%
• 5Y*: 27.45%
• 10Y*: 19.08%

BOTZ

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -10.83%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 18.98%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRM vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	54.64%	-18.24%	54.48%	46.52%	-0.08%	87.74%	0.98%	5.87%	-7.97%	23.56%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	2.46%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IRM and BOTZ is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016	0.38

Return for Risk

IRM vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRM

IRM Risk / Return Rank: 67
IRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IRM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IRM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 25
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRM vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IRM	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	0.76	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.22	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.14	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	0.99	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.73	3.26	-0.53

IRM vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRM Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRM and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IRM vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRM drawdown since its inception was -55.71%, roughly equal to the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRM and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRM	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.71%	-55.54%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.15%	-19.34%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.03%	-29.02%	-10.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.03%	-55.54%	+16.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-10.83%	+7.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.16%	-18.29%	+5.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.47%	5.84%	+4.63%

Volatility

IRM vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is 7.91%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that IRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRM	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.91%	8.89%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.13%	19.49%	+4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.04%	25.07%	+6.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.68%	26.90%	+2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.64%	25.79%	+3.85%

Dividends

IRM vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

IRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than BOTZ's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.64%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%
IRM Iron Mountain Incorporated	2.59%	3.88%	2.60%	3.63%	4.96%	4.73%	8.39%	7.69%	7.32%	5.93%	6.17%	7.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRM and BOTZ in my portfolio?

IRM and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRM or BOTZ?

BOTZ has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to IRM (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRM dropped -55.71% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.