IRFIX vs. FIKMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IRFIX (Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund) and FIKMX (Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, IRFIX returned -3.47%/yr vs 3.68%/yr for FIKMX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRFIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FIKMX.

Performance

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRFIX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than FIKMX's 3.43% return.

IRFIX

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -4.76%
• YTD: -1.53%
• 6M: 0.49%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: 4.99%
• 5Y*: -3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.51%

FIKMX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.08%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 7.92%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: 3.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund	-1.53%	23.52%	-10.56%	4.58%	-23.84%	7.66%	-0.81%	23.74%	-0.47%
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z	3.43%	7.29%	8.03%	9.51%	-14.48%	19.04%	-0.98%	18.04%	-1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IRFIX and FIKMX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	0.58

The correlation between IRFIX and FIKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IRFIX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRFIX

IRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6
IRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
IRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
IRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

FIKMX

FIKMX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FIKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FIKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
FIKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FIKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FIKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRFIX	FIKMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	2.03	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	2.88	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.38	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	2.40	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.26	10.40	-9.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the FIKMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRFIX and FIKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRFIX	FIKMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	2.03	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	0.57	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.55	-0.36

Drawdowns

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRFIX drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, which is greater than FIKMX's maximum drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRFIX and FIKMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRFIX	FIKMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.13%	-34.49%	-35.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.85%	-3.43%	-11.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.06%	-7.16%	-13.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.41%	-18.04%	-20.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.98%	-0.64%	-17.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.65%	-5.15%	-13.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	0.79%	+3.98%

Volatility

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.16%. This indicates that IRFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRFIX	FIKMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	1.16%	+2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.78%	3.08%	+7.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	4.05%	+8.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.33%	6.48%	+8.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	10.59%	+5.09%

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRFIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRFIX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison

IRFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than FIKMX's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z	4.67%	4.80%	4.81%	5.15%	6.24%	1.59%	4.90%	5.82%	2.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRFIX Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund	6.27%	6.17%	3.24%	2.62%	2.62%	7.70%	3.40%	9.81%	4.19%	3.37%	6.46%	3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRFIX and FIKMX in my portfolio?

IRFIX and FIKMX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRFIX or FIKMX?

IRFIX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to FIKMX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRFIX dropped -70.13% vs FIKMX's -34.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIKMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.