PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IREN vs. L.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IREN vs. L.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IREN Limited (IREN) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IREN is traded in USD, while L.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the L.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IREN achieves a 50.57% return, which is significantly higher than L.TO's -0.85% return.


IREN

1D
-5.15%
1M
0.07%
YTD
50.57%
6M
35.28%
1Y
443.17%
3Y*
131.23%
5Y*
10Y*

L.TO

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
0.10%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
31.01%
5Y*
29.41%
10Y*
25.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IREN vs. L.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IREN
IREN Limited
50.57%284.62%37.34%472.00%-92.27%-42.25%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
-0.85%41.13%42.49%16.45%14.71%5.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IREN and L.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.03

Fundamentals

EPS

IREN:

$0.45

L.TO:

CA$3.72

PE Ratio

IREN:

125.41

L.TO:

17.05

PS Ratio

IREN:

12.74

L.TO:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

IREN:

$757.07M

L.TO:

CA$64.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IREN:

$433.88M

L.TO:

CA$19.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

IREN:

-$173.05M

L.TO:

CA$7.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IREN vs. L.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IREN
IREN Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IREN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IREN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IREN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IREN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IREN Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

L.TO
L.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
L.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
L.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
L.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
L.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IREN vs. L.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IREN Limited (IREN) and Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRENL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.11

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.62

0.76

+6.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.43

1.71

+12.72

IREN vs. L.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IREN Sharpe Ratio is 4.34, which is higher than the L.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IREN and L.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IREN vs. L.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IREN drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than L.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IREN and L.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRENL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-52.16%

-44.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.62%

-14.75%

-43.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.56%

-14.75%

-50.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.57%

-11.47%

-14.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.23%

-7.71%

-57.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.91%

6.58%

+24.33%

Volatility

IREN vs. L.TO - Volatility Comparison

IREN Limited (IREN) has a higher volatility of 30.39% compared to Loblaw Companies Limited (L.TO) at 6.70%. This indicates that IREN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRENL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.39%

6.70%

+23.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

73.97%

16.21%

+57.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

103.13%

21.15%

+81.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.41%

19.82%

+98.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

118.41%

21.30%

+97.11%

Dividends

IREN vs. L.TO - Dividend Comparison

IREN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while L.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IREN
IREN Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
L.TO
Loblaw Companies Limited
0.91%2.19%4.20%5.43%5.28%5.40%8.15%7.40%6.45%7.84%7.27%7.61%

Financials

IREN vs. L.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between IREN Limited and Loblaw Companies Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
208.24M
14.48B
(IREN) Total Revenue
(L.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. IREN values in USD, L.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


IREN and L.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IREN and L.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer