IREG vs. INTW
IREG (Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IREG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
IREG vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IREG achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.
IREG
- 1D
- -7.71%
- 1M
- -15.58%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- -7.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -12.49%
- 1M
- 12.21%
- YTD
- 750.22%
- 6M
- 775.58%
- 1Y
- 1,964.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IREG vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IREG Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF | 15.19% | 16.86% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 750.22% | -3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IREG and INTW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IREG vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
IREG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
IREG vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IREG | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.65 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 40.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 91.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IREG vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IREG drawdown since its inception was -80.08%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IREG and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IREG | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.08% | -60.58% | -19.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.09% | -12.49% | -41.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.16% | -29.66% | -14.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.70% | — |
Volatility
IREG vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IREG | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 55.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 119.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 207.96% | 150.14% | +57.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 207.96% | 148.88% | +59.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 207.96% | 148.88% | +59.08% |
IREG vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
IREG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IREG vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither IREG nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IREG and INTW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
IREG and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IREG and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for IREG and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer