PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRE vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRE vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IREN ETF (IRE) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRE achieves a 61.20% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.15% return.


IRE

1D
-3.62%
1M
53.26%
YTD
61.20%
6M
8.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTJL

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.20%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.91%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRE vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IRE and QTJL is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRE vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRE

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRE vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IREN ETF (IRE) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IRE vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IREQTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.29

0.52

-0.81

Drawdowns

IRE vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRE drawdown since its inception was -90.87%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRE and QTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IREQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.87%

-33.40%

-57.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.95%

-0.01%

-68.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.97%

-7.94%

-62.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

IRE vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IREQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

214.53%

10.01%

+204.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

214.53%

20.42%

+194.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

214.53%

20.42%

+194.11%

IRE vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRE has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRE vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither IRE nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IRE and QTJL have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for IRE.

IRE and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance ETFs and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for IRE and 0.79% for QTJL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRE and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer