PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRCZX vs. FSTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRCZX achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than FSTSX's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IRCZX has underperformed FSTSX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while FSTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.


IRCZX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.90%
YTD
14.23%
6M
17.44%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
8.87%

FSTSX

1D
-0.62%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.04%
6M
8.80%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
6.05%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRCZX
AB International Small Cap Portfolio
14.23%34.96%7.69%13.19%-20.89%12.49%8.23%19.37%-17.67%32.14%
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
7.04%27.49%4.97%18.36%-26.25%18.29%19.61%28.24%-13.19%34.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IRCZX and FSTSX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.89

The correlation between IRCZX and FSTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRCZX vs. FSTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRCZX
IRCZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IRCZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRCZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRCZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
IRCZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRCZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FSTSX
FSTSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FSTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) and Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRCZXFSTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

1.57

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

5.32

+4.71

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRCZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the FSTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRCZX and FSTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRCZXFSTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.27

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.37

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.62

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Drawdowns

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRCZX drawdown since its inception was -44.50%, which is greater than FSTSX's maximum drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRCZX and FSTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRCZXFSTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.50%

-38.91%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-11.22%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-14.47%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.68%

-38.91%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.50%

-38.91%

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.69%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-7.89%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.30%

-0.42%

Volatility

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Volatility Comparison

AB International Small Cap Portfolio (IRCZX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund (FSTSX) at 4.47%. This indicates that IRCZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRCZXFSTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.47%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

11.07%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

13.92%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

16.42%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

15.94%

+0.22%

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRCZX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTSX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRCZX vs. FSTSX - Dividend Comparison

IRCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, less than FSTSX's 14.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSTSX
Fidelity Series International Small Cap Fund
14.23%15.24%10.22%3.34%6.38%13.22%0.81%4.27%10.99%6.30%4.01%7.32%
IRCZX
AB International Small Cap Portfolio
13.52%15.44%2.70%2.95%1.07%3.88%1.14%1.96%10.24%3.79%2.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRCZX and FSTSX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRCZX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to FSTSX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRCZX dropped -44.50% vs FSTSX's -38.91%.

IRCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRCZX and FSTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer