PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBT vs. SCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IRBT vs. SCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iRobot Corporation (IRBT) and Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, IRBT has outperformed SCNX with an annualized return of -35.64%, while SCNX has yielded a comparatively lower -38.41% annualized return.


IRBT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-86.24%
1Y
-85.65%
3Y*
-77.32%
5Y*
-65.65%
10Y*
-35.64%

SCNX

1D
-2.79%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
-25.49%
6M
-37.54%
1Y
-54.92%
3Y*
-50.00%
5Y*
-59.69%
10Y*
-38.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBT vs. SCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRBT
iRobot Corporation
0.00%-93.98%-79.97%-19.59%-26.94%-17.95%58.58%-39.54%9.18%31.22%
SCNX
Scienture Holdings, Inc
-25.49%-91.57%86.89%-13.95%-82.94%-55.39%-19.85%266.67%-33.33%-2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBT and SCNX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2010

0.09

The correlation between IRBT and SCNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IRBT:

$16.26M

SCNX:

$154.40M

EPS

IRBT:

-$6.11

SCNX:

-$303.01

PS Ratio

IRBT:

0.03

SCNX:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

IRBT:

$547.00M

SCNX:

$56.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

IRBT:

$120.28M

SCNX:

$54.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

IRBT:

-$181.19M

SCNX:

-$3.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


iRobot Corporation

Scienture Holdings, Inc

Return for Risk

IRBT vs. SCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBT
IRBT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IRBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SCNX
SCNX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBT vs. SCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iRobot Corporation (IRBT) and Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRBTSCNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

-0.15

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.46

2.14

-2.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.31

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.61

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.80

-0.62

IRBT vs. SCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the SCNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBT and SCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRBTSCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

-0.15

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

-0.27

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

-0.17

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

-0.00

-0.25

Drawdowns

IRBT vs. SCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBT drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, roughly equal to the maximum SCNX drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBT and SCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBTSCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-99.85%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.64%

-90.73%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.09%

-98.86%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.54%

-99.64%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.71%

-99.74%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.71%

-99.77%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.30%

-81.77%

+35.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.71%

69.06%

-10.35%

Volatility

IRBT vs. SCNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iRobot Corporation (IRBT) is 0.00%, while Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX) has a volatility of 14.92%. This indicates that IRBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRBTSCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

14.92%

-14.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

175.47%

79.90%

+95.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

169.92%

375.78%

-205.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.34%

220.64%

-116.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.18%

229.70%

-146.52%

Dividends

IRBT vs. SCNX - Dividend Comparison

Neither IRBT nor SCNX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IRBT
iRobot Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCNX
Scienture Holdings, Inc
0.00%0.00%157.02%

Financials

IRBT vs. SCNX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between iRobot Corporation and Scienture Holdings, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
145.83M
56.33M
(IRBT) Total Revenue
(SCNX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IRBT and SCNX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCNX has higher volatility (14.92%) compared to IRBT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBT dropped -99.71% vs SCNX's -99.85%.

SCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRBT and SCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer