SCNX vs. RZLV
SCNX (Scienture Holdings, Inc) and RZLV (Rezolve AI Ltd) are both stocks. SCNX operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while RZLV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, SCNX returned -55.58% vs 50.00% for RZLV. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCNX vs. RZLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCNX achieves a -23.35% return, which is significantly lower than RZLV's 10.89% return.
SCNX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -23.35%
- 6M
- -29.34%
- 1Y
- -55.58%
- 3Y*
- -49.53%
- 5Y*
- -59.46%
- 10Y*
- -38.24%
RZLV
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 50.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCNX vs. RZLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCNX Scienture Holdings, Inc | -23.35% | -91.57% | -27.72% |
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | 10.89% | -32.72% | -62.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCNX and RZLV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
SCNX:
-$303.01
RZLV:
-$0.59
SCNX:
1.02
RZLV:
103.81
SCNX:
$56.75M
RZLV:
$6.41M
SCNX:
$54.17M
RZLV:
$6.12M
SCNX:
-$3.54B
RZLV:
-$99.67M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCNX vs. RZLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCNX
RZLV
SCNX vs. RZLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX) and Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | 0.43 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.58 | +0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 0.59 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 0.85 | -1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 0.43 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.35 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
SCNX vs. RZLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCNX drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than RZLV's maximum drawdown of -89.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCNX and RZLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -89.04% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -90.73% | -72.15% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.76% | -72.36% | -27.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.76% | -66.79% | -14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.85% | 49.92% | +18.93% |
Volatility
SCNX vs. RZLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX) is 14.88%, while Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) has a volatility of 22.03%. This indicates that SCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.88% | 22.03% | -7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.24% | 81.85% | -1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 375.76% | 116.34% | +259.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 220.64% | 144.96% | +75.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 229.74% | 144.96% | +84.78% |
Dividends
SCNX vs. RZLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCNX nor RZLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCNX Scienture Holdings, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 157.02% |
Financials
SCNX vs. RZLV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scienture Holdings, Inc and Rezolve AI Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SCNX and RZLV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RZLV has higher volatility (22.03%) compared to SCNX (14.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCNX dropped -99.85% vs RZLV's -89.04%.
RZLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCNX and RZLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer