SCNX vs. RZLV
SCNX (Scienture Holdings, Inc) and RZLV (Rezolve AI Ltd) are both stocks. SCNX operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while RZLV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, SCNX returned -79.74% vs -12.29% for RZLV. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SCNX vs. RZLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SCNX
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- 6M
- -14.48%
- YTD
- -24.12%
- 1Y
- -79.74%
- 3Y*
- -60.38%
- 5Y*
- -61.58%
- 10Y*
- -39.20%
- ALL TIME*
- -9.17%
RZLV
- 1D
- 5.76%
- 1M
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -52.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | $17.96M | $22.43M | $38.13M |
| $97.01K | $1.36M | $571.05K |
SCNX vs. RZLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SCNX Scienture Holdings, Inc | -24.12% | -91.57% | -16.20% |
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | -0.00% | -32.72% | -64.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCNX and RZLV is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
SCNX:
$5.97M
RZLV:
$687.29M
SCNX:
$56.75M
RZLV:
$6.41M
SCNX:
$54.17M
RZLV:
$6.12M
SCNX:
-$3.54B
RZLV:
-$99.67M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCNX vs. RZLV — Risk / Return Rank
SCNX
RZLV
SCNX vs. RZLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX) and Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.07 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.17 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -0.22 | -0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCNX vs. RZLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCNX drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than RZLV's maximum drawdown of -89.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCNX and RZLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -89.63% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -90.73% | -72.15% | -18.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -76.42% | -23.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.93% | -69.17% | -12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 77.10% | 56.79% | +20.31% |
Volatility
SCNX vs. RZLV - Volatility Comparison
Scienture Holdings, Inc (SCNX) has a higher volatility of 19.62% compared to Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) at 14.41%. This indicates that SCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RZLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCNX | RZLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.62% | 14.41% | +5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.93% | 60.12% | +16.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 374.53% | 110.07% | +264.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 216.83% | 140.64% | +76.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 228.63% | 140.64% | +87.99% |
Dividends
SCNX vs. RZLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither SCNX nor RZLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCNX Scienture Holdings, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 157.02% |
Financials
SCNX vs. RZLV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scienture Holdings, Inc and Rezolve AI Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SCNX and RZLV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCNX has higher volatility (19.62%) compared to RZLV (14.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCNX dropped -99.85% vs RZLV's -89.63%.
RZLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCNX and RZLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer