PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBT vs. TER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IRBT vs. TER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iRobot Corporation (IRBT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, IRBT has underperformed TER with an annualized return of -35.64%, while TER has yielded a comparatively higher 36.21% annualized return.


IRBT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-86.24%
1Y
-85.65%
3Y*
-77.32%
5Y*
-65.65%
10Y*
-35.64%

TER

1D
4.34%
1M
21.45%
YTD
111.82%
6M
110.17%
1Y
404.26%
3Y*
58.93%
5Y*
25.97%
10Y*
36.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBT vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IRBT
iRobot Corporation
0.00%-93.98%-79.97%-19.59%-26.94%-17.95%58.58%-39.54%9.18%31.22%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
111.82%54.39%16.51%24.78%-46.35%36.81%76.73%118.93%-24.37%66.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBT and TER is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2005

0.37

The correlation between IRBT and TER shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IRBT:

$16.26M

TER:

$64.58B

EPS

IRBT:

-$6.11

TER:

$5.38

PS Ratio

IRBT:

0.03

TER:

17.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

IRBT:

$547.00M

TER:

$3.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IRBT:

$120.28M

TER:

$2.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

IRBT:

-$181.19M

TER:

$1.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRBT vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBT
IRBT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
IRBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

TER
TER Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBT vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iRobot Corporation (IRBT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRBTTERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

6.28

-6.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.46

4.92

-5.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.70

-0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

15.25

-16.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.42

55.87

-57.29

IRBT vs. TER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBT Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the TER Sharpe Ratio of 6.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBT and TER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRBTTERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

6.28

-6.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.64

0.53

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

0.81

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.23

-0.48

Drawdowns

IRBT vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBT drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, roughly equal to the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBT and TER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBTTERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.71%

-97.30%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.64%

-26.73%

-64.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.09%

-58.18%

-40.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.54%

-59.12%

-40.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.71%

-59.12%

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.71%

-1.97%

-97.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.30%

-58.71%

+12.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

58.71%

7.28%

+51.43%

Volatility

IRBT vs. TER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iRobot Corporation (IRBT) is 0.00%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 20.31%. This indicates that IRBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRBTTERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

20.31%

-20.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

175.47%

50.09%

+125.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

169.92%

64.87%

+105.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

104.34%

49.61%

+54.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.18%

44.96%

+38.22%

Dividends

IRBT vs. TER - Dividend Comparison

IRBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRBT
iRobot Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.12%0.25%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%

Financials

IRBT vs. TER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between iRobot Corporation and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
145.83M
1.28B
(IRBT) Total Revenue
(TER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IRBT vs. TER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between iRobot Corporation and Teradyne, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
31.0%
60.9%
Portfolio components
IRBT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRobot Corporation reported a gross profit of 45.25M and revenue of 145.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.95M and revenue of 1.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

IRBT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRobot Corporation reported an operating income of -17.67M and revenue of 145.83M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.1%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 473.00M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

IRBT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, iRobot Corporation reported a net income of -21.53M and revenue of 145.83M, resulting in a net margin of -14.8%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 398.91M and revenue of 1.28B, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IRBT and TER have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TER has higher volatility (20.31%) compared to IRBT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBT dropped -99.71% vs TER's -97.30%.

TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.28 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRBT and TER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer