PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBO vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRBO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 54.55% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.


IRBO

1D
-6.30%
1M
8.26%
YTD
54.55%
6M
54.11%
1Y
93.11%
3Y*
33.04%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
54.55%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%6.32%48.85%34.47%-13.76%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and SLV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRBO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRBOSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

1.47

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.28

3.16

+13.12

IRBO vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBO and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBOSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-76.28%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-47.23%

+28.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-47.23%

+14.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

-47.23%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-47.23%

+39.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.76%

-44.65%

+24.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

21.91%

-16.17%

Volatility

IRBO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 14.34%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRBOSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.32%

14.34%

+4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.00%

59.27%

-29.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.22%

60.33%

-26.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.57%

36.59%

-7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.30%

32.09%

-3.79%

IRBO vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRBO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.06%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRBO and SLV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRBO has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to SLV (14.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 18.31% vs 11.69% for IRBO. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 14.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 18.31% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IRBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IRBO is categorized as Robotics, while SLV is Silver. IRBO tracks Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 0.50% for SLV.

IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRBO and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer