IRBO vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IRBO (iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRBO is a Robotics fund tracking the NYSE FactSet Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Index, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. IRBO is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IRBO returned 14.13%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EATZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

IRBO vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRBO achieves a 66.09% return, which is significantly higher than EATZ's 4.80% return.

IRBO

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 26.10%
• YTD: 66.09%
• 6M: 63.47%
• 1Y: 112.42%
• 3Y*: 36.54%
• 5Y*: 14.13%
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: -6.88%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBO vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IRBO iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF	66.09%	29.97%	8.02%	36.37%	-37.89%	-3.24%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	4.80%	-6.67%	23.21%	25.23%	-20.68%	-5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and EATZ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between IRBO and EATZ has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IRBO vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IRBO	EATZ
Technology	83.8%	-
Communication Services	5.5%	2.3%
Industrials	4.7%	4.9%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	2.9%	78.2%
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	16.9%
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-

Return for Risk

IRBO vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO

IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 90
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IRBO	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.78	0.10	+3.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	0.28	+3.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.03	+0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.01	0.08	+5.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.88	0.14	+20.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IRBO vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRBO Sharpe Ratio is 3.78, which is higher than the EATZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRBO and EATZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IRBO	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.78	0.10	+3.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.10	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.12	+0.51

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRBO drawdown since its inception was -54.50%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRBO and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IRBO	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.50%	-34.40%	-20.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.81%	-23.21%	+4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	-23.21%	-9.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.53%	-33.34%	-17.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-13.56%	+12.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.85%	-13.40%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.40%	12.82%	-7.42%

Volatility

IRBO vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) at 4.91%. This indicates that IRBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IRBO	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.01%	4.91%	+7.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.12%	13.48%	+11.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.94%	18.81%	+11.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.58%	21.65%	+6.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.75%	21.60%	+6.15%

IRBO vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

IRBO vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IRBO iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.88%	0.75%	2.41%	0.53%	0.69%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IRBO and EATZ in my portfolio?

IRBO and EATZ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IRBO or EATZ?

IRBO has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to EATZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRBO dropped -54.50% vs EATZ's -34.40%.

Which ETF is better, IRBO or EATZ?

On 5-year performance, IRBO leads with 14.13% vs 2.20% for EATZ. On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EATZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IRBO or EATZ?

Over the 5-year period, IRBO has performed better with a 14.13% return vs 2.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IRBO or EATZ?

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IRBO or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for IRBO.

What is the main difference between IRBO and EATZ?

IRBO is categorized as Robotics, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 1.00% for EATZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.