PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRBO vs. EATZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRBO vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IRBO

1D
-0.63%
1M
7.58%
YTD
53.58%
6M
52.53%
1Y
86.57%
3Y*
32.76%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*

EATZ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRBO vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
53.58%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%-1.49%
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
4.80%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IRBO and EATZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between IRBO and EATZ has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IRBO vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IRBO
EATZ

Technology

83.8%

-

Communication Services

5.5%
2.3%

Industrials

4.7%
4.9%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.9%
78.2%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
16.9%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Technology

IRBO
83.8%
EATZ

-

Communication Services

IRBO
5.5%
EATZ
2.3%

Industrials

IRBO
4.7%
EATZ
4.9%

Utilities

IRBO
3.2%
EATZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

IRBO
2.9%
EATZ
78.2%

Real Estate

IRBO
1.2%
EATZ

-

Consumer Defensive

IRBO
0.0%
EATZ
16.9%

Healthcare

IRBO
0.0%
EATZ

-

Basic Materials

IRBO

-

EATZ

-

Energy

IRBO

-

EATZ

-

Financial Services

IRBO

-

EATZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRBO vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRBO vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IRBOEATZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

IRBO vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IRBO vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRBOEATZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

Volatility

IRBO vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRBOEATZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.29%

IRBO vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRBO vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than EATZ's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.48%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.06%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRBO and EATZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.

IRBO is categorized as Robotics, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 1.00% for EATZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRBO and EATZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer