IRBO vs. EATZ
IRBO (iShares Future AI & Tech ETF) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IRBO is a Robotics fund tracking the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, while EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. IRBO is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRBO charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.
Performance
IRBO vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IRBO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 7.58%
- YTD
- 53.58%
- 6M
- 52.53%
- 1Y
- 86.57%
- 3Y*
- 32.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EATZ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRBO vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 53.58% | 29.97% | 8.02% | 36.37% | -37.89% | -1.49% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 4.80% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRBO and EATZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IRBO and EATZ has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IRBO vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRBO
EATZ
Technology
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Technology
IRBO
EATZ
-
Communication Services
IRBO
EATZ
Industrials
IRBO
EATZ
Utilities
IRBO
EATZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
IRBO
EATZ
Real Estate
IRBO
EATZ
-
Consumer Defensive
IRBO
EATZ
Healthcare
IRBO
EATZ
-
Basic Materials
IRBO
-
EATZ
-
Energy
IRBO
-
EATZ
-
Financial Services
IRBO
-
EATZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRBO vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank
IRBO
EATZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IRBO vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRBO | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRBO vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRBO | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.37% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.75% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | — | — |
Volatility
IRBO vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRBO | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.23% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.56% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.29% | — | — |
IRBO vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRBO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRBO vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison
IRBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than EATZ's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IRBO iShares Future AI & Tech ETF | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.50% | 0.88% | 0.75% | 2.41% | 0.53% | 0.69% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRBO and EATZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.
EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.06% for IRBO.
IRBO is categorized as Robotics, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IRBO and 1.00% for EATZ.
Find the right allocation for IRBO and EATZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer