PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSZ vs. RSPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSZ achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than RSPE's 15.73% return.


IQSZ

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.86%
6M
10.99%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPE

1D
0.78%
1M
1.36%
6M
11.14%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
25.85%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IQSZ and RSPE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.75

The correlation between IQSZ and RSPE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSZ vs. RSPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSZ
IQSZ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IQSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQSZRSPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.90

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.42

11.49

+1.92

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the RSPE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSZ and RSPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSZ drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, smaller than the maximum RSPE drawdown of -22.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSZ and RSPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSZRSPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-22.93%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-8.95%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.10%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-5.92%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.26%

-0.11%

Volatility

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) at 2.92%. This indicates that IQSZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSZRSPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

2.92%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

9.44%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

12.71%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

16.66%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.07%

16.66%

-2.59%

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IQSZ vs. RSPE - Dividend Comparison

IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than RSPE's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IQSZ
Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF
1.77%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.45%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSZ and RSPE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSZ has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to RSPE (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSZ dropped -9.12% vs RSPE's -22.93%.

On 1-year performance, IQSZ leads with 28.75% vs 25.85% for RSPE. On fees, IQSZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQSZ has performed better with a 28.75% return vs 25.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSPE.

IQSZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.45% for RSPE.

IQSZ is categorized as ESG, while RSPE is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.20% for RSPE.

IQSZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSZ and RSPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer