PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSZ vs. PRXV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IQSZ

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
12.10%
6M
10.99%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PRXV

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.79%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IQSZ and PRXV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSZ drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSZ and PRXV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSZPRXVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-1.41%

-7.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-0.49%

-1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-0.40%

-0.84%

Volatility

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSZPRXVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

10.68%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

10.68%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

10.68%

+3.51%

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSZ vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison

IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IQSZ and PRXV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IQSZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQSZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.

IQSZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

IQSZ is categorized as ESG, while PRXV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for IQSZ and 0.36% for PRXV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSZ and PRXV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer