PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSU vs. QCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSU vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than QCLR's 1.40% return.


IQSU

1D
-0.46%
1M
6.63%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.30%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

QCLR

1D
0.00%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.40%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
11.39%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSU vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
13.06%14.44%16.64%32.96%-22.10%8.04%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
1.40%11.27%20.27%28.87%-18.87%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and QCLR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.79

The correlation between IQSU and QCLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSU vs. QCLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSU
QCLR

Technology

34.0%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.0%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
12.2%

Financial Services

11.7%
0.2%

Industrials

6.8%
2.9%

Healthcare

6.2%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.7%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.1%

Energy

1.3%
0.6%

Utilities

1.2%
1.4%

Technology

IQSU
34.0%
QCLR
53.8%

Communication Services

IQSU
15.0%
QCLR
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSU
14.8%
QCLR
12.2%

Financial Services

IQSU
11.7%
QCLR
0.2%

Industrials

IQSU
6.8%
QCLR
2.9%

Healthcare

IQSU
6.2%
QCLR
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

IQSU
3.5%
QCLR
7.7%

Real Estate

IQSU
2.8%
QCLR
0.1%

Basic Materials

IQSU
2.7%
QCLR
1.1%

Energy

IQSU
1.3%
QCLR
0.6%

Utilities

IQSU
1.2%
QCLR
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSU vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSU
IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLR
QCLR Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSU vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSUQCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

1.17

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

1.60

+1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.12

+1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.74

4.02

+6.71

IQSU vs. QCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the QCLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and QCLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSUQCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.17

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.67

+0.12

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and QCLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSUQCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-21.77%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-10.22%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-13.58%

-7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.89%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-6.20%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.84%

-0.10%

Volatility

IQSU vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 0.45%. This indicates that IQSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSUQCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

0.45%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

7.24%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

9.82%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

12.42%

+5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

12.42%

+8.26%

IQSU vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSU vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than QCLR's 14.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.09%1.12%1.15%1.47%1.07%0.98%
QCLR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF
14.68%14.89%8.89%0.47%0.27%1.64%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSU and QCLR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSU has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to QCLR (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs QCLR's -21.77%.

On 3-year performance, IQSU leads with 19.64% vs 13.84% for QCLR. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QCLR has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLR.

QCLR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 0.97% for IQSU.

IQSU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QCLR is Nasdaq-100. IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while QCLR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.60% for QCLR.

IQSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSU and QCLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer