IQSU vs. MMIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IQSU (IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF) and MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while MMIT is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by New York Life. IQSU is passively managed, while MMIT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQSU returned 12.84%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MMIT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQSU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for MMIT.

Performance

IQSU vs. MMIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than MMIT's 1.44% return.

IQSU

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 13.30%
• 1Y: 29.34%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —

MMIT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 3.87%
• 5Y*: 1.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSU vs. MMIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF	13.06%	14.44%	16.64%	32.96%	-22.10%	30.53%	28.24%	1.24%
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	1.44%	5.03%	1.46%	5.42%	-7.40%	1.55%	6.17%	-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and MMIT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019	0.11

IQSU vs. MMIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQSU	MMIT
Technology	34.0%	-
Communication Services	15.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.8%	-
Financial Services	11.7%	-1.1%
Industrials	6.8%	-
Healthcare	6.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	-
Real Estate	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.7%	-
Energy	1.3%	-
Utilities	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

IQSU vs. MMIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSU

IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 61
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

MMIT

MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 69
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSU vs. MMIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQSU	MMIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.59	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.84	-0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.54	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.42	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.74	8.24	+2.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQSU vs. MMIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the MMIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and MMIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQSU	MMIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.59	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.32	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.63	+0.16

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. MMIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than MMIT's maximum drawdown of -12.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and MMIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSU	MMIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.29%	-12.28%	-19.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-2.59%	-8.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.96%	-3.96%	-17.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.76%	-12.28%	-14.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.73%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-2.27%	-3.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	0.76%	+1.98%

Volatility

IQSU vs. MMIT - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) at 0.77%. This indicates that IQSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQSU	MMIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	0.77%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.83%	1.66%	+8.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.85%	2.55%	+11.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	3.54%	+14.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.68%	4.30%	+16.38%

IQSU vs. MMIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MMIT's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQSU vs. MMIT - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than MMIT's 3.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF	0.97%	1.09%	1.12%	1.15%	1.47%	1.07%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.57%	3.54%	3.76%	3.46%	2.30%	1.81%	2.59%	4.14%	2.46%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSU and MMIT in my portfolio?

IQSU and MMIT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQSU or MMIT?

IQSU has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to MMIT (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs MMIT's -12.28%.

Which ETF is better, IQSU or MMIT?

On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 12.84% vs 1.14% for MMIT. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MMIT has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQSU or MMIT?

Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 1.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSU or MMIT?

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQSU or MMIT?

MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.97% for IQSU.

What is the main difference between IQSU and MMIT?

IQSU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MMIT is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.31% for MMIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.