PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSU vs. MMIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSU vs. MMIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than MMIN's 2.32% return.


IQSU

1D
-0.46%
1M
6.63%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.30%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

MMIN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.85%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.74%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSU vs. MMIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
13.06%14.44%16.64%32.96%-22.10%30.53%28.24%1.24%
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
2.32%4.65%0.93%7.45%-11.20%1.35%7.47%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and MMIN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019

0.09

IQSU vs. MMIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSU
MMIN

Technology

34.0%

-

Communication Services

15.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%

-

Financial Services

11.7%
-0.9%

Industrials

6.8%

-

Healthcare

6.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.5%

-

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Energy

1.3%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Technology

IQSU
34.0%
MMIN

-

Communication Services

IQSU
15.0%
MMIN

-

Consumer Cyclical

IQSU
14.8%
MMIN

-

Financial Services

IQSU
11.7%
MMIN
-0.9%

Industrials

IQSU
6.8%
MMIN

-

Healthcare

IQSU
6.2%
MMIN

-

Consumer Defensive

IQSU
3.5%
MMIN

-

Real Estate

IQSU
2.8%
MMIN

-

Basic Materials

IQSU
2.7%
MMIN

-

Energy

IQSU
1.3%
MMIN

-

Utilities

IQSU
1.2%
MMIN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSU vs. MMIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSU
IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MMIN
MMIN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSU vs. MMIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSUMMINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.46

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.66

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.25

-0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.74

11.93

-1.19

IQSU vs. MMIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the MMIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and MMIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSUMMINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.46

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.15

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.38

+0.41

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. MMIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than MMIN's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and MMIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSUMMINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-16.87%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-2.87%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-7.22%

-13.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-16.87%

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.08%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-4.32%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

0.78%

+1.96%

Volatility

IQSU vs. MMIN - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) at 1.16%. This indicates that IQSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSUMMINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

1.16%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

2.49%

+7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

3.81%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

5.02%

+12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

6.97%

+13.71%

IQSU vs. MMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MMIN's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSU vs. MMIN - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than MMIN's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.09%1.12%1.15%1.47%1.07%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
4.12%4.07%3.96%3.73%2.93%1.72%2.21%2.75%2.78%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSU and MMIN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSU has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to MMIN (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs MMIN's -16.87%.

On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 12.84% vs 0.74% for MMIN. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MMIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIN.

MMIN has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.97% for IQSU.

IQSU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MMIN is Municipal Bonds. IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while MMIN tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.31% for MMIN.

MMIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSU and MMIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer