IQSU vs. MMIN
IQSU (IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF) and MMIN (IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQSU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while MMIN is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQSU returned 12.84%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MMIN. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQSU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for MMIN.
Performance
IQSU vs. MMIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than MMIN's 2.32% return.
IQSU
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
MMIN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IQSU vs. MMIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 13.06% | 14.44% | 16.64% | 32.96% | -22.10% | 30.53% | 28.24% | 1.24% |
MMIN IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF | 2.32% | 4.65% | 0.93% | 7.45% | -11.20% | 1.35% | 7.47% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSU and MMIN is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.09 |
IQSU vs. MMIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSU
MMIN
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IQSU
MMIN
-
Communication Services
IQSU
MMIN
-
Consumer Cyclical
IQSU
MMIN
-
Financial Services
IQSU
MMIN
Industrials
IQSU
MMIN
-
Healthcare
IQSU
MMIN
-
Consumer Defensive
IQSU
MMIN
-
Real Estate
IQSU
MMIN
-
Basic Materials
IQSU
MMIN
-
Energy
IQSU
MMIN
-
Utilities
IQSU
MMIN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSU vs. MMIN — Risk / Return Rank
IQSU
MMIN
IQSU vs. MMIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSU | MMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 2.46 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.91 | 3.66 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.49 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.25 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.74 | 11.93 | -1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSU | MMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.46 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.15 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.38 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
IQSU vs. MMIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than MMIN's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and MMIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSU | MMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -16.87% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -2.87% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.96% | -7.22% | -13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.76% | -16.87% | -9.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.08% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -4.32% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 0.78% | +1.96% |
Volatility
IQSU vs. MMIN - Volatility Comparison
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) at 1.16%. This indicates that IQSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSU | MMIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 1.16% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 2.49% | +7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 3.81% | +10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.88% | 5.02% | +12.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 6.97% | +13.71% |
IQSU vs. MMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MMIN's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQSU vs. MMIN - Dividend Comparison
IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than MMIN's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSU IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.12% | 1.15% | 1.47% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMIN IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF | 4.12% | 4.07% | 3.96% | 3.73% | 2.93% | 1.72% | 2.21% | 2.75% | 2.78% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSU and MMIN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQSU has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to MMIN (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs MMIN's -16.87%.
On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 12.84% vs 0.74% for MMIN. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MMIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIN.
MMIN has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.97% for IQSU.
IQSU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MMIN is Municipal Bonds. IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while MMIN tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.31% for MMIN.
MMIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSU and MMIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer