PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSU vs. MMIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSU vs. MMIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly higher than MMIN's 1.04% return.


IQSU

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.97%
6M
11.18%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
11.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.73%

MMIN

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.99%
6M
0.15%
YTD
1.04%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$149.00K$251.27K$317.14K
$2.09M$1.90M$1.85M

IQSU vs. MMIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
12.56%14.44%16.64%32.96%-22.10%30.53%28.24%0.98%
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
1.04%4.65%0.93%7.45%-11.20%1.35%7.47%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and MMIN is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.10

The correlation between IQSU and MMIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSU vs. MMIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IQSU
IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MMIN
MMIN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MMIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQSU vs. MMIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQSUMMINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.63

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.63

9.23

-0.60

IQSU vs. MMIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the MMIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and MMIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. MMIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, which is greater than MMIN's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and MMIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSUMMINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-16.87%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-2.87%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-5.82%

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-16.81%

-9.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-2.06%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-4.26%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

0.82%

+2.01%

Volatility

IQSU vs. MMIN - Volatility Comparison

IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF (MMIN) at 1.17%. This indicates that IQSU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSUMMINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

1.17%

+3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

2.71%

+8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.19%

3.59%

+10.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

5.05%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

6.93%

+13.69%

IQSU vs. MMIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MMIN's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSU vs. MMIN - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MMIN's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
0.99%1.09%1.12%1.15%1.47%1.07%0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMIN
IQ MacKay Municipal Insured ETF
4.07%4.07%3.96%3.73%2.93%1.72%2.21%2.75%2.78%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSU and MMIN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQSU has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to MMIN (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs MMIN's -16.87%.

On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 11.42% vs 0.30% for MMIN. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, MMIN has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 11.42% return vs 0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for MMIN.

MMIN has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 0.99% for IQSU.

IQSU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MMIN is Municipal Bonds. IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while MMIN tracks Bloomberg Barclays Municipal All Insured Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.31% for MMIN.

MMIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSU and MMIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer