PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSU vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSU vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSU achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 16.90% return.


IQSU

1D
-0.46%
1M
6.63%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.30%
1Y
29.34%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
-0.66%
1M
12.43%
YTD
16.90%
6M
16.56%
1Y
44.84%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSU vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
13.06%14.44%16.64%32.96%-22.10%30.53%24.99%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
16.90%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%33.74%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSU and ALTL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.67

The correlation between IQSU and ALTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSU vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IQSU
ALTL

Technology

34.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

15.0%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
5.7%

Financial Services

11.7%
16.6%

Industrials

6.8%
10.2%

Healthcare

6.2%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
10.8%

Real Estate

2.8%
14.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.0%

Energy

1.3%
0.9%

Utilities

1.2%
26.8%

Technology

IQSU
34.0%
ALTL
4.6%

Communication Services

IQSU
15.0%
ALTL
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IQSU
14.8%
ALTL
5.7%

Financial Services

IQSU
11.7%
ALTL
16.6%

Industrials

IQSU
6.8%
ALTL
10.2%

Healthcare

IQSU
6.2%
ALTL
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

IQSU
3.5%
ALTL
10.8%

Real Estate

IQSU
2.8%
ALTL
14.8%

Basic Materials

IQSU
2.7%
ALTL
2.0%

Energy

IQSU
1.3%
ALTL
0.9%

Utilities

IQSU
1.2%
ALTL
26.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSU vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSU
IQSU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IQSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSU Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSU vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSUALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.51

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

3.29

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

4.60

-1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.74

16.35

-5.61

IQSU vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSU and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSUALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.51

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.28

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.73

+0.07

Drawdowns

IQSU vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSU drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSU and ALTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSUALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-31.91%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-9.79%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.96%

-21.21%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.76%

-31.91%

+5.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.66%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-11.58%

+5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.75%

-0.01%

Volatility

IQSU vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF (IQSU) is 3.64%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that IQSU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSUALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

7.26%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

10.97%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

18.05%

-4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

18.38%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.68%

20.09%

+0.59%

IQSU vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSU vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

IQSU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than ALTL's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
0.94%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%
IQSU
IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.09%1.12%1.15%1.47%1.07%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSU and ALTL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALTL has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to IQSU (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSU dropped -31.29% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

On 5-year performance, IQSU leads with 12.84% vs 5.04% for ALTL. On fees, IQSU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IQSU has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQSU has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQSU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

IQSU has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.94% for ALTL.

IQSU tracks IQ Candriam ESG US Equity Index, while ALTL tracks Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: New York Life and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IQSU and 0.60% for ALTL.

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSU and ALTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer