PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQSS.L is traded in GBp, while SSLV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SSLV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSS.L achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than SSLV.L's 3.32% return.


IQSS.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
6.33%
YTD
14.34%
6M
15.71%
1Y
32.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SSLV.L

1D
0.44%
1M
1.00%
YTD
3.32%
6M
28.22%
1Y
115.96%
3Y*
42.32%
5Y*
22.62%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IQSS.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
14.34%14.30%6.63%
SSLV.L
Invesco Physical Silver ETC
3.32%130.03%-4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSS.L and SSLV.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSS.L
IQSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SSLV.L
SSLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SSLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSS.LSSLV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

2.98

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.62

6.51

+13.10

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the SSLV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSS.L and SSLV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSS.LSSLV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

2.07

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.16

+1.19

Drawdowns

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.91%, smaller than the maximum SSLV.L drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSS.L and SSLV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSS.LSSLV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-67.74%

+48.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-38.71%

+31.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-33.61%

+33.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.86%

-43.04%

+40.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

17.73%

-16.09%

Volatility

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) is 3.21%, while Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that IQSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQSS.LSSLV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

16.84%

-13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

52.73%

-44.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.18%

55.60%

-44.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

33.88%

-19.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.10%

30.06%

-15.96%

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLV.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQSS.L vs. SSLV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSS.L nor SSLV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IQSS.L and SSLV.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSLV.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSLV.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IQSS.L.

IQSS.L is categorized as ESG, while SSLV.L is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IQSS.L and 0.19% for SSLV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQSS.L and SSLV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer