PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IQSS.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
-1.12%14.30%6.63%
DFNG.L
VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP
8.95%56.54%17.95%
Different Trading Currencies

IQSS.L is traded in GBp, while DFNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DFNG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSS.L achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than DFNG.L's 8.95% return.


IQSS.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
4.37%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFNG.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.17%
YTD
8.95%
6M
2.39%
1Y
45.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DFNG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSS.L
IQSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DFNG.L
DFNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSS.LDFNG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.85

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.52

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.34

-1.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.50

8.11

-0.62

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the DFNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSS.L and DFNG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSS.LDFNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.85

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

2.27

-1.47

Correlation

The correlation between IQSS.L and DFNG.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSS.L nor DFNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.91%, which is greater than DFNG.L's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSS.L and DFNG.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSS.LDFNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-12.87%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-12.87%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-11.00%

+5.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-2.62%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

5.30%

-2.92%

Volatility

IQSS.L vs. DFNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) is 4.48%, while VanEck Defense ETF A USD Acc GBP (DFNG.L) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that IQSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IQSS.LDFNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

7.32%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

18.35%

-9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

24.46%

-9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

19.97%

-5.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

19.97%

-5.75%