PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IQSS.L
Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc
-1.12%14.30%6.63%
SGLP.L
Invesco Physical Gold A
9.24%53.60%12.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSS.L achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than SGLP.L's 9.24% return.


IQSS.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
4.37%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SGLP.L

1D
1.52%
1M
-10.00%
YTD
9.24%
6M
22.42%
1Y
44.60%
3Y*
29.65%
5Y*
22.71%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SGLP.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSS.L
IQSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLP.L
SGLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) and Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQSS.LSGLP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.84

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

2.30

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.48

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.50

10.57

-3.07

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the SGLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSS.L and SGLP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQSS.LSGLP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.84

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.56

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between IQSS.L and SGLP.L is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSS.L nor SGLP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSS.L drawdown since its inception was -18.91%, smaller than the maximum SGLP.L drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSS.L and SGLP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IQSS.LSGLP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-38.83%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-17.89%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-11.70%

+5.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-13.38%

+10.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

4.21%

-1.83%

Volatility

IQSS.L vs. SGLP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSS.L) is 4.48%, while Invesco Physical Gold A (SGLP.L) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that IQSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IQSS.LSGLP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

11.61%

-7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

20.94%

-12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

24.13%

-9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

15.96%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

15.68%

-1.46%