IQSM vs. DEUS
IQSM (IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and DEUS (Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - IQSM tracks the IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net while DEUS tracks the Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQSM returned 11.37%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for DEUS. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IQSM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for DEUS.
Performance
IQSM vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSM achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly lower than DEUS's 15.12% return.
IQSM
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.08%
DEUS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 21.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $618.40K | $852.23K | $985.08K | |
| $9.67K | $146.66K | $208.73K |
IQSM vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 13.78% | 7.97% | 9.15% | 15.82% | 2.29% |
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 15.12% | 10.41% | 14.33% | 14.73% | 5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSM and DEUS is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IQSM and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQSM vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQSM
DEUS
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
IQSM
DEUS
Technology
IQSM
DEUS
Healthcare
IQSM
DEUS
Financial Services
IQSM
DEUS
Consumer Cyclical
IQSM
DEUS
Real Estate
IQSM
DEUS
Basic Materials
IQSM
DEUS
Consumer Defensive
IQSM
DEUS
Communication Services
IQSM
DEUS
Energy
IQSM
DEUS
Utilities
IQSM
DEUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSM vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank
IQSM
DEUS
IQSM vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQSM | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.92 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 11.25 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQSM vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSM drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum DEUS drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSM and DEUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSM | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -40.47% | +16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -6.83% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -16.69% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.53% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -4.28% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 1.77% | +0.63% |
Volatility
IQSM vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison
IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (IQSM) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) at 3.09%. This indicates that IQSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSM | DEUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.09% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 8.23% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 11.17% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 15.49% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 17.95% | -0.23% |
IQSM vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQSM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQSM vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison
IQSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than DEUS's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEUS Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF | 1.38% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.49% | 1.74% | 1.14% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 1.31% | 2.75% |
IQSM IQ Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.06% | 1.18% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSM and DEUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQSM has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to DEUS (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQSM dropped -23.66% vs DEUS's -40.47%.
On 3-year performance, DEUS leads with 14.88% vs 11.37% for IQSM. On fees, IQSM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DEUS has performed better with a 14.88% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQSM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.
DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.06% for IQSM.
IQSM tracks IQ Candriam ESG U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IQSM and 0.17% for DEUS.
DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQSM and DEUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer