IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE
IQQY.DE (iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - IQQY.DE tracks the MSCI Europe while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQY.DE returned 9.17%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQY.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQY.DE achieves a 7.35% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQY.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 9.17%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
IQQY.DE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 7.35%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 15.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQY.DE iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 7.35% | 20.51% | 8.32% | 15.43% | -9.13% | 25.32% | -3.28% | 27.76% | -10.88% | 10.56% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQY.DE and AMED.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IQQY.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQY.DE
AMED.DE
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IQQY.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQY.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 2.49 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 9.40 | -3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQY.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.74 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.65 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.47 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQY.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQY.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQY.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.18% | -38.35% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -10.56% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -14.07% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -24.06% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.47% | -38.35% | +2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -0.17% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -6.69% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.81% | -0.27% |
Volatility
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IQQY.DE) is 4.34%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IQQY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQY.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.61% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 12.64% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 15.19% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 15.87% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 17.00% | -1.38% |
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQY.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IQQY.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQY.DE iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.54% | 2.54% | 2.88% | 2.87% | 2.92% | 2.24% | 2.06% | 3.04% | 3.26% | 2.63% | 2.85% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IQQY.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQY.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQY.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMED.DE.
IQQY.DE tracks MSCI Europe, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IQQY.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQY.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer