IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE
IQQX.DE (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF) and IS3N.DE (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQX.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while IS3N.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQX.DE returned 6.29%/yr vs 10.00%/yr for IS3N.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IS3N.DE.
Performance
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQX.DE achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 25.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQX.DE has underperformed IS3N.DE with an annualized return of 6.29%, while IS3N.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.00% annualized return.
IQQX.DE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
IS3N.DE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 25.82%
- 6M
- 26.34%
- 1Y
- 45.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 13.33% | 14.78% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 2.81% | 11.77% | -18.85% | 16.80% | -11.26% | 2.03% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 25.82% | 17.14% | 13.87% | 7.20% | -14.09% | 7.38% | 7.07% | 21.01% | -11.06% | 20.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQX.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IQQX.DE and IS3N.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQX.DE
IS3N.DE
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQX.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.49 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 4.42 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.94 | 16.00 | +4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQX.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 2.69 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.53 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.55 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.45%, which is greater than IS3N.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQX.DE and IS3N.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQX.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -35.06% | -34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -10.52% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | -19.17% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.28% | -22.01% | +1.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.78% | -32.51% | -10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -2.49% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -9.30% | -5.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.91% | -1.27% |
Volatility
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) is 2.93%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that IQQX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQX.DE | IS3N.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 7.16% | -4.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 14.69% | -6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 17.32% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 16.19% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 18.04% | -2.29% |
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQX.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 4.84% | 5.36% | 6.66% | 4.62% | 3.16% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.16% | 4.03% | 4.88% |
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQX.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS3N.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS3N.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.
IQQX.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQX.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQX.DE and IS3N.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer