IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE
IQQX.DE (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF) and CEBL.DE (iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - IQQX.DE tracks the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50 while CEBL.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQX.DE returned 6.29%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for CEBL.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQX.DE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CEBL.DE.
Performance
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQX.DE achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than CEBL.DE's 31.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQX.DE has underperformed CEBL.DE with an annualized return of 6.29%, while CEBL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.
IQQX.DE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
CEBL.DE
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 32.33%
- 1Y
- 54.45%
- 3Y*
- 22.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 13.33% | 14.78% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 2.81% | 11.77% | -18.85% | 16.80% | -11.26% | 2.03% |
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 31.90% | 19.13% | 18.60% | 3.15% | -15.54% | 2.03% | 15.18% | 22.17% | -12.65% | 25.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQX.DE and CEBL.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IQQX.DE and CEBL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQX.DE
CEBL.DE
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) and iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQX.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.50 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.55 | 4.83 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.94 | 17.67 | +3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQX.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 2.81 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.48 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.43 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.45%, which is greater than CEBL.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQX.DE and CEBL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQX.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -35.09% | -34.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.18% | -11.43% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | -20.53% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.28% | -29.00% | +8.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.78% | -33.12% | -9.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -2.85% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -11.09% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.13% | -1.49% |
Volatility
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) is 2.93%, while iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) (CEBL.DE) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that IQQX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQX.DE | CEBL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 8.24% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 16.36% | -7.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 19.68% | -8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.01% | 18.48% | -5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 18.94% | -3.19% |
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CEBL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQX.DE vs. CEBL.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while CEBL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEBL.DE iShares MSCI EM Asia UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 4.84% | 5.36% | 6.66% | 4.62% | 3.16% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.16% | 4.03% | 4.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQX.DE and CEBL.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEBL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEBL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.
IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50, while CEBL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQX.DE and 0.20% for CEBL.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQX.DE and CEBL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer