IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE
IQQU.DE (iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - IQQU.DE tracks the MSCI Europe ex UK while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQU.DE returned 9.38%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQU.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQU.DE achieves a 7.54% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IQQU.DE having a 9.38% annualized return and AMED.DE not far ahead at 9.75%.
IQQU.DE
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQU.DE iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 7.54% | 20.11% | 6.36% | 17.27% | -12.23% | 24.46% | 1.53% | 28.71% | -11.38% | 11.87% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQU.DE and AMED.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between IQQU.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQU.DE
AMED.DE
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (IQQU.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQU.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 2.49 | -0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 9.40 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQU.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.74 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.65 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.57 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.47 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQU.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.97%, which is greater than AMED.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQU.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQU.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.97% | -38.35% | -21.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -10.56% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.34% | -14.07% | -2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -24.06% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | -38.35% | +3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -0.17% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -6.69% | -8.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.81% | -0.08% |
Volatility
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (IQQU.DE) is 4.32%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IQQU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQU.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 5.61% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 12.64% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 15.19% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 15.87% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 17.00% | -1.31% |
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQU.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQU.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while AMED.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQU.DE iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 1.98% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.36% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.43% | 2.31% | 2.67% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IQQU.DE and AMED.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQU.DE.
IQQU.DE tracks MSCI Europe ex UK, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQU.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQU.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer