IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and IBC6.DE (iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while IBC6.DE tracks the MSCI Australia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for IBC6.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBC6.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than IBC6.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed IBC6.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while IBC6.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.07% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
IBC6.DE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 11.70%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 10.86% | 1.01% | 8.47% | 10.05% | -0.95% | 18.21% | -1.41% | 25.74% | -7.69% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and IBC6.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.58 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and IBC6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
IBC6.DE
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.16 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 1.61 | +10.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 4.12 | +31.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 0.89 | +3.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.38 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.42 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.32 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than IBC6.DE's maximum drawdown of -43.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and IBC6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -43.64% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -7.49% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -23.12% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -23.12% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -43.64% | +11.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.69% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -7.84% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.92% | +0.22% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (IBC6.DE) at 3.71%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBC6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | IBC6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 3.71% | +6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 10.68% | +8.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 13.47% | +10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 16.70% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 19.31% | +1.49% |
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IBC6.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. IBC6.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while IBC6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBC6.DE iShares MSCI Australia UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and IBC6.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBC6.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBC6.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while IBC6.DE tracks MSCI Australia. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.50% for IBC6.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and IBC6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer