IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and DBX7.DE (Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while DBX7.DE tracks the Nifty 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for DBX7.DE. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBX7.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than DBX7.DE's -14.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed DBX7.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while DBX7.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.12% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 75.07%
- 1Y
- 111.86%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
DBX7.DE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -14.67%
- 6M
- -15.66%
- 1Y
- -16.62%
- 3Y*
- -0.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.12%
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
DBX7.DE Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -14.67% | -7.11% | 11.08% | 14.41% | 0.26% | 31.14% | 0.48% | 12.15% | -2.45% | 19.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DBX7.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007 | 0.50 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DBX7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
DBX7.DE
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | DBX7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 0.83 | +0.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | -0.83 | +13.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | -1.76 | +37.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | DBX7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | -1.10 | +5.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.19 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.30 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.18 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, smaller than the maximum DBX7.DE drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and DBX7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | DBX7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -64.45% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -19.90% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -26.75% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -26.75% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -41.75% | +9.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -25.53% | +23.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -15.94% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 9.42% | -6.28% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBX7.DE) at 5.80%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBX7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | DBX7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 5.80% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 12.49% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 15.10% | +9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 15.60% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 20.35% | +0.45% |
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBX7.DE's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. DBX7.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while DBX7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX7.DE Xtrackers Nifty 50 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and DBX7.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQQT.DE is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQT.DE is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBX7.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while DBX7.DE tracks Nifty 50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.85% for DBX7.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and DBX7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer