IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for AMEA.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEA.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQT.DE achieves a 70.08% return, which is significantly higher than AMEA.DE's 31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE has outperformed AMEA.DE with an annualized return of 21.81%, while AMEA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.07% annualized return.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 12.50%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 72.22%
- 1Y
- 110.41%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and AMEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
AMEA.DE
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.50 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 4.74 | +7.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 17.16 | +18.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 2.85 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.48 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.58 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, which is greater than AMEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and AMEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -34.43% | -23.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.58% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -20.48% | -11.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -28.78% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -33.31% | +0.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.69% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -11.52% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.21% | -0.07% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) at 8.10%. This indicates that IQQT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 8.10% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 16.15% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 19.29% | +4.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 18.27% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 18.97% | +1.83% |
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQT.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and AMEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer