IQQQ vs. QTEC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QTEC (First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - IQQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index while QTEC tracks the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IQQQ returned 29.47% vs 53.38% for QTEC. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QTEC.

Performance

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly lower than QTEC's 40.25% return.

IQQQ

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 13.95%
• 6M: 12.28%
• 1Y: 29.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTEC

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 37.40%
• 1Y: 53.38%
• 3Y*: 31.63%
• 5Y*: 15.73%
• 10Y*: 23.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.95%	17.11%	14.82%
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	40.25%	22.28%	0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ and QTEC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024	0.91

The correlation between IQQQ and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IQQQ vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ

IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 56
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

QTEC

QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 70
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IQQQ	QTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.05	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	2.60	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.35	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.05	10.49	-1.45

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ and QTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, smaller than the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and QTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQQ	QTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.41%	-58.86%	+38.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-16.03%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.54%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-3.83%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-9.87%	+6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	5.10%	-1.83%

Volatility

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) is 8.20%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 14.21%. This indicates that IQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQQQ	QTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.20%	14.21%	-6.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.57%	21.98%	-8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.00%	26.11%	-9.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.06%	29.73%	-10.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	27.75%	-8.69%

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQQQ vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than QTEC's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	4.61%	10.34%	7.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund	0.01%	0.00%	0.02%	0.14%	0.15%	0.02%	0.44%	0.68%	0.91%	0.80%	1.29%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQQQ and QTEC in my portfolio?

IQQQ and QTEC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQQQ or QTEC?

QTEC has higher volatility (14.21%) compared to IQQQ (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQQQ dropped -20.41% vs QTEC's -58.86%.

Which ETF is better, IQQQ or QTEC?

On 1-year performance, QTEC leads with 53.38% vs 29.47% for IQQQ. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQQQ or QTEC?

Over the 1-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 53.38% return vs 29.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQQQ or QTEC?

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQQQ or QTEC?

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.01% for QTEC.

What is the main difference between IQQQ and QTEC?

IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index, while QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.57% for QTEC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.