IQQQ vs. QBUF
IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QBUF (Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - IQQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index while QBUF tracks the Invesco QQQ Trust. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IQQQ returned 38.70% vs 11.93% for QBUF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQQ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBUF.
Performance
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQQ achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than QBUF's 4.68% return.
IQQQ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- 1Y
- 38.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBUF
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 18.72% | 17.11% | 5.46% |
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 4.68% | 11.08% | 5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQQ and QBUF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IQQQ and QBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IQQQ
QBUF
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
IQQQ
QBUF
Communication Services
IQQQ
QBUF
Consumer Cyclical
IQQQ
QBUF
Consumer Defensive
IQQQ
QBUF
Healthcare
IQQQ
QBUF
Industrials
IQQQ
QBUF
Utilities
IQQQ
QBUF
Basic Materials
IQQQ
QBUF
Energy
IQQQ
QBUF
Financial Services
IQQQ
QBUF
Real Estate
IQQQ
QBUF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQQ vs. QBUF — Risk / Return Rank
IQQQ
QBUF
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.48 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 5.19 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | 17.79 | -5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.28 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQQ drawdown since its inception was -20.41%, which is greater than QBUF's maximum drawdown of -8.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ and QBUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.41% | -8.84% | -11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -2.31% | -8.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.01% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -0.82% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 0.67% | +2.46% |
Volatility
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (QBUF) at 0.23%. This indicates that IQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQQ | QBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 0.23% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 3.88% | +7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 5.25% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 8.47% | +10.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.57% | 8.47% | +10.10% |
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQQ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QBUF's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQQ vs. QBUF - Dividend Comparison
IQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while QBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 4.42% | 10.34% | 7.27% |
QBUF Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQQ and QBUF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQQQ has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to QBUF (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQQQ dropped -20.41% vs QBUF's -8.84%.
On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 38.70% vs 11.93% for QBUF. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, QBUF has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 38.70% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUF.
IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.00% for QBUF.
IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index, while QBUF tracks Invesco QQQ Trust. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IQQQ and 0.79% for QBUF.
IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IQQQ and QBUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer