PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQQ.DE vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IQQQ.DE is traded in EUR, while VDC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQQ.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 9.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQQ.DE has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 9.10%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.


IQQQ.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-1.42%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
9.10%

VDC

1D
2.55%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
9.57%
6M
7.87%
1Y
4.02%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQQ.DE
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
-0.71%5.27%10.22%9.85%-16.58%42.81%4.77%38.59%-6.82%11.64%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
9.57%-9.95%20.78%-0.68%4.30%26.44%1.72%28.96%-3.46%-1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQQ.DE and VDC is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQQ.DE
IQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQQ.DEVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.06

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.51

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

0.97

-0.48

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQQ.DE and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQQ.DEVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

0.31

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.56

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.49

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.66

-0.16

Drawdowns

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.04%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -25.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQQ.DE and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQ.DEVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.04%

-25.86%

-22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-7.99%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-16.06%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-16.06%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.50%

-24.59%

-9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-7.07%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-5.60%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

4.15%

-0.64%

Volatility

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) is 3.43%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that IQQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQ.DEVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

5.17%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

10.68%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

13.18%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

13.66%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

15.58%

-0.39%

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQQ.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQQ.DE vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

IQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than VDC's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQQ.DE
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF
1.65%1.56%1.12%1.31%1.17%1.88%1.16%1.55%2.08%1.76%1.85%1.79%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.14%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQQ.DE and VDC have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQQ.DE.

IQQQ.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. IQQQ.DE tracks S&P Global Water, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQQ.DE and 0.09% for VDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQQ.DE and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer