IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE
IQQK.DE (iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist)) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQK.DE tracks the MSCI Korea 20/35 while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQK.DE returned 19.47%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQK.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.
Performance
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQK.DE achieves a 107.68% return, which is significantly higher than LCUA.DE's 31.85% return.
IQQK.DE
- 1D
- -4.65%
- 1M
- 11.93%
- YTD
- 107.68%
- 6M
- 121.46%
- 1Y
- 216.52%
- 3Y*
- 44.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- 16.55%
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 32.05%
- 1Y
- 53.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQK.DE iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) | 107.68% | 77.35% | -18.08% | 15.54% | -24.11% | -1.13% | 30.60% | 14.38% | -14.08% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQK.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IQQK.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQK.DE
LCUA.DE
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQK.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | 1.49 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.70 | 4.49 | +6.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.75 | 16.33 | +22.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQK.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.92 | 2.72 | +3.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.48 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.48 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQK.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.13%, which is greater than LCUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQK.DE and LCUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQK.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.13% | -33.18% | -34.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.96% | -12.13% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.51% | -21.07% | -9.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.53% | -28.54% | -12.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -2.86% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.35% | -12.02% | -5.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 3.34% | +2.46% |
Volatility
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQK.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.23% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) at 8.54%. This indicates that IQQK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQK.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.23% | 8.54% | +8.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.01% | 17.04% | +15.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.90% | 20.08% | +17.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 18.48% | +7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.84% | 19.46% | +5.38% |
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQK.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQK.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQK.DE iShares MSCI Korea UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.36% | 0.75% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.11% | 0.69% | 1.12% | 0.89% | 0.69% | 0.56% | 0.39% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQK.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQK.DE.
IQQK.DE tracks MSCI Korea 20/35, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQK.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQK.DE and LCUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer