IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS
IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and TDIV.AS (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQH.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy, while TDIV.AS is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQH.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 12.02%/yr for TDIV.AS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQH.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDIV.AS.
Performance
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQH.DE achieves a 39.28% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV.AS's 9.89% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IQQH.DE having a 11.71% annualized return and TDIV.AS not far ahead at 12.02%.
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.45%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 78.04%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
TDIV.AS
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 9.89%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 25.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
TDIV.AS VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 9.89% | 24.40% | 15.98% | 10.91% | 16.18% | 27.85% | -10.17% | 20.97% | -7.12% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQH.DE and TDIV.AS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2016 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IQQH.DE and TDIV.AS has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS — Risk / Return Rank
IQQH.DE
TDIV.AS
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQH.DE | TDIV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.51 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 7.19 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.88 | 19.93 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQH.DE | TDIV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.79 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 1.43 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.84 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQH.DE drawdown since its inception was -86.09%, which is greater than TDIV.AS's maximum drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQH.DE and TDIV.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQH.DE | TDIV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.09% | -36.06% | -50.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.32% | -3.51% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.43% | -15.26% | -29.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.70% | -15.26% | -42.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.78% | -36.06% | -27.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.01% | -1.99% | -22.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.78% | -3.93% | -55.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.90% | 1.26% | +2.64% |
Volatility
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.79% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDIV.AS) at 2.38%. This indicates that IQQH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQH.DE | TDIV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.79% | 2.38% | +7.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 6.65% | +11.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 9.06% | +15.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 12.07% | +12.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 14.31% | +10.77% |
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQH.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV.AS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQH.DE vs. TDIV.AS - Dividend Comparison
IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than TDIV.AS's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
TDIV.AS VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.19% | 3.58% | 4.19% | 4.98% | 4.55% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 4.93% | 3.95% | 1.11% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQH.DE and TDIV.AS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TDIV.AS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDIV.AS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
IQQH.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while TDIV.AS is Global Equity Income. IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy, while TDIV.AS tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IQQH.DE and 0.38% for TDIV.AS.
Find the right allocation for IQQH.DE and TDIV.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer