IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE
IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - IQQC.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while XCHA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE returned 2.69%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for XCHA.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCHA.DE.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.DE's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE has underperformed XCHA.DE with an annualized return of 2.69%, while XCHA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.08% annualized return.
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 18.05% | -9.09% | 18.68% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 31.24% | 44.98% | -21.84% | 18.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2012 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IQQC.DE and XCHA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQC.DE
XCHA.DE
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQC.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.38 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 4.62 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQC.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 1.48 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.13 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.39 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.31 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than XCHA.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and XCHA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQC.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.50% | -52.27% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.24% | -16.43% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -26.32% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.35% | -37.07% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | -38.55% | -15.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -1.81% | -22.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -22.73% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 8.48% | -1.32% |
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) at 5.10%. This indicates that IQQC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQC.DE | XCHA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 5.10% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 10.37% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 26.51% | -8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 23.27% | +4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 23.20% | +1.87% |
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQC.DE and XCHA.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCHA.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCHA.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQC.DE and XCHA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer