IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and SEC0.DE (iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQC.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50, while SEC0.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQQC.DE returned 8.94%/yr vs 56.37%/yr for SEC0.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SEC0.DE.

Performance

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than SEC0.DE's 98.10% return.

IQQC.DE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: -7.00%
• 6M: -9.66%
• 1Y: -2.21%
• 3Y*: 8.94%
• 5Y*: -2.24%
• 10Y*: 2.69%

SEC0.DE

• 1D: -2.85%
• 1M: 18.95%
• YTD: 98.10%
• 6M: 98.14%
• 1Y: 188.23%
• 3Y*: 56.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	-7.00%	14.32%	39.12%	-16.33%	-13.36%	-6.88%
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	98.10%	36.46%	20.85%	61.01%	-32.22%	21.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQC.DE and SEC0.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021	0.34

Return for Risk

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQC.DE

IQQC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8
IQQC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
IQQC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
IQQC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8
IQQC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
IQQC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8

SEC0.DE

SEC0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 97
SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
SEC0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
SEC0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SEC0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SEC0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQQC.DE	SEC0.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	5.89	-5.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	5.86	-5.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.75	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.11	14.81	-14.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	52.61	-52.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 5.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQC.DE and SEC0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQQC.DE	SEC0.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	5.89	-5.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	1.17	-0.99

Drawdowns

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than SEC0.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and SEC0.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQQC.DE	SEC0.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.50%	-39.35%	-28.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.24%	-12.90%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.71%	-39.35%	+11.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.02%	-2.85%	-21.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.16%	-11.85%	-16.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.16%	3.64%	+3.52%

Volatility

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) is 6.75%, while iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a volatility of 13.13%. This indicates that IQQC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQQC.DE	SEC0.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	13.13%	-6.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	25.14%	-12.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.72%	32.42%	-14.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.20%	29.95%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.07%	29.95%	-4.88%

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SEC0.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQQC.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while SEC0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF	1.92%	1.78%	2.26%	2.52%	2.51%	1.85%	2.51%	2.45%	3.03%	2.38%	2.33%	2.63%
SEC0.DE iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQQC.DE and SEC0.DE in my portfolio?

IQQC.DE and SEC0.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IQQC.DE or SEC0.DE?

On fees, SEC0.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQQC.DE or SEC0.DE?

SEC0.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.

What is the main difference between IQQC.DE and SEC0.DE?

IQQC.DE is categorized as China Equities, while SEC0.DE is Semiconductors. IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.35% for SEC0.DE.