IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE
IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) and LYPS.DE (Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQC.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50, while LYPS.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE returned 2.69%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for LYPS.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQC.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYPS.DE.
Performance
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQC.DE achieves a -7.00% return, which is significantly lower than LYPS.DE's 11.42% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQC.DE has underperformed LYPS.DE with an annualized return of 2.69%, while LYPS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.17% annualized return.
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
LYPS.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 18.05% | -9.09% | 18.68% |
LYPS.DE Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 11.42% | 4.89% | 32.52% | 22.69% | -14.10% | 40.92% | 7.06% | 34.95% | -1.02% | 6.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQC.DE and LYPS.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.48 |
The correlation between IQQC.DE and LYPS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQC.DE
LYPS.DE
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) and Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 3.60 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 12.84 | -13.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.21 | -2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.97 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.94 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.98 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQC.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.50%, which is greater than LYPS.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQC.DE and LYPS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.50% | -33.81% | -33.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.24% | -7.12% | -8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.71% | -23.37% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.35% | -23.37% | -23.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.92% | -33.81% | -20.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -0.48% | -23.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.16% | -4.01% | -24.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.16% | 2.00% | +5.16% |
Volatility
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYPS.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that IQQC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYPS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQC.DE | LYPS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 2.63% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.55% | 7.58% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 11.58% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 15.21% | +12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 16.10% | +8.97% |
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQC.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than LYPS.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQC.DE vs. LYPS.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than LYPS.DE's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
LYPS.DE Amundi S&P 500 II UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.04% | 2.11% | 1.09% | 1.54% | 1.63% | 1.93% | 1.75% | 1.88% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQC.DE and LYPS.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYPS.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYPS.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
IQQC.DE is categorized as China Equities, while LYPS.DE is S&P 500. IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while LYPS.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQC.DE and 0.07% for LYPS.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQC.DE and LYPS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer