PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQB.DE achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.


IQQB.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-12.83%
YTD
10.83%
6M
3.33%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
7.16%

EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQB.DE
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
10.83%29.90%-24.72%25.50%22.21%-15.61%-22.22%25.55%-1.12%6.76%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-2.37%3.70%5.06%-1.17%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQB.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.01

Over the past year, IQQB.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.21) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQB.DE
IQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQB.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

0.43

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.01

1.18

+4.83

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQB.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.34

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.28

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.05

+0.14

Drawdowns

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQB.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.27%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQB.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.27%

-17.79%

-51.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.51%

-2.75%

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.88%

-4.02%

-23.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

-17.03%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.51%

-8.66%

-7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-6.76%

-21.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.83%

0.99%

+3.84%

Volatility

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that IQQB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQB.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.70%

1.35%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

2.82%

+14.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

3.46%

+18.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.87%

4.64%

+21.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.51%

4.27%

+27.24%

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQB.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQB.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQB.DE
iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.36%4.47%6.44%5.50%13.94%6.23%1.92%2.46%2.55%1.49%1.74%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQB.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQB.DE.

IQQB.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. IQQB.DE tracks MSCI Brazil, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQB.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQB.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer