IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE
IQQ9.DE (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF) and EUNL.DE (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQ9.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while EUNL.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQ9.DE returned 2.77%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for EUNL.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQ9.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EUNL.DE.
Performance
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQ9.DE achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQ9.DE has underperformed EUNL.DE with an annualized return of 2.77%, while EUNL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.
IQQ9.DE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -8.56%
- 6M
- -12.10%
- 1Y
- -4.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
EUNL.DE
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ9.DE iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF | -8.56% | 15.30% | 20.91% | -10.61% | -21.82% | -19.54% | 6.55% | 27.83% | -5.24% | 19.36% |
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.86% | 7.90% | 25.93% | 20.13% | -13.59% | 32.71% | 5.48% | 31.34% | -5.13% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ9.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2009 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IQQ9.DE and EUNL.DE has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ9.DE
EUNL.DE
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQ9.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.40 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 3.64 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 14.52 | -14.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQ9.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 2.12 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.90 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.84 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.82 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ9.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than EUNL.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ9.DE and EUNL.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ9.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -33.63% | -31.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.80% | -6.50% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | -21.73% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.28% | -21.73% | -30.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -33.63% | -25.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.26% | -0.31% | -40.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.71% | -4.25% | -23.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 1.64% | +6.87% |
Volatility
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that IQQ9.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ9.DE | EUNL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 2.62% | +4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 7.72% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 11.16% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 14.17% | +14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 15.17% | +10.31% |
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ9.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ9.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQ9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNL.DE iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQ9.DE iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.75% | 2.66% | 3.70% | 1.62% | 1.51% | 2.03% | 3.03% | 1.99% | 1.83% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ9.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQ9.DE.
IQQ9.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. IQQ9.DE tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQ9.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQ9.DE and EUNL.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer