PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ9.DE achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than AE5A.DE's 27.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQ9.DE has underperformed AE5A.DE with an annualized return of 2.77%, while AE5A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.98% annualized return.


IQQ9.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-8.56%
6M
-12.10%
1Y
-4.68%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
-6.79%
10Y*
2.77%

AE5A.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.57%
YTD
27.41%
6M
28.14%
1Y
48.94%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQ9.DE
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF
-8.56%15.30%20.91%-10.61%-21.82%-19.54%6.55%27.83%-5.24%19.36%
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
27.41%19.26%14.36%5.58%-14.19%4.19%7.49%21.04%-11.21%20.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ9.DE and AE5A.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between IQQ9.DE and AE5A.DE has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ9.DE
IQQ9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IQQ9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AE5A.DE
AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQ9.DEAE5A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.50

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

4.80

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.45

17.35

-17.80

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ9.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ9.DE and AE5A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQ9.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

2.79

-2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.51

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.53

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.42

-0.41

Drawdowns

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ9.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than AE5A.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ9.DE and AE5A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQ9.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.58%

-36.16%

-29.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.80%

-10.34%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.76%

-19.22%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.28%

-23.47%

-28.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-32.24%

-26.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.26%

-2.56%

-38.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.71%

-9.72%

-17.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.51%

2.87%

+5.64%

Volatility

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) have volatilities of 7.44% and 7.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQ9.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

7.32%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

14.97%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

17.82%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.68%

17.23%

+11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.48%

19.05%

+6.43%

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ9.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AE5A.DE's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ9.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than AE5A.DE's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
1.69%2.15%3.38%3.80%2.44%1.62%1.71%2.01%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQ9.DE
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF
1.60%1.78%2.75%2.66%3.70%1.62%1.51%2.03%3.03%1.99%1.83%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQ9.DE and AE5A.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQ9.DE.

IQQ9.DE tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQ9.DE and 0.14% for AE5A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ9.DE and AE5A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer