IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE
IQQ9.DE (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF) and H4Z3.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IQQ9.DE tracks the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index while H4Z3.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQQ9.DE returned 6.20%/yr vs 20.42%/yr for H4Z3.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IQQ9.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for H4Z3.DE.
Performance
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQ9.DE achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than H4Z3.DE's 27.75% return.
IQQ9.DE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -8.56%
- 6M
- -12.10%
- 1Y
- -4.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
H4Z3.DE
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 27.75%
- 6M
- 28.22%
- 1Y
- 49.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ9.DE iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF | -8.56% | 15.30% | 20.91% | -10.61% | -12.14% |
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 27.75% | 18.60% | 13.73% | 4.66% | -6.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ9.DE and H4Z3.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IQQ9.DE and H4Z3.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ9.DE
H4Z3.DE
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQ9.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.52 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 4.77 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 17.12 | -17.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQ9.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 2.85 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.91 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ9.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than H4Z3.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ9.DE and H4Z3.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ9.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -18.86% | -46.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.80% | -10.47% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | -18.86% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.26% | -2.73% | -38.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.71% | -4.95% | -22.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 2.92% | +5.59% |
Volatility
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) have volatilities of 7.44% and 7.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ9.DE | H4Z3.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 7.35% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 14.91% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 17.54% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 15.77% | +12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 15.77% | +9.71% |
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ9.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z3.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ9.DE vs. H4Z3.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQ9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while H4Z3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQ9.DE iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.75% | 2.66% | 3.70% | 1.62% | 1.51% | 2.03% | 3.03% | 1.99% | 1.83% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ9.DE and H4Z3.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4Z3.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4Z3.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQ9.DE.
IQQ9.DE tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while H4Z3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQ9.DE and 0.15% for H4Z3.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQ9.DE and H4Z3.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer