IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE
IQQ9.DE (iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF) and 84X0.DE (iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - IQQ9.DE tracks the FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index while 84X0.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IQQ9.DE returned -4.68% vs 67.73% for 84X0.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQ9.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for 84X0.DE.
Performance
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQ9.DE achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly lower than 84X0.DE's 40.37% return.
IQQ9.DE
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -8.56%
- 6M
- -12.10%
- 1Y
- -4.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
84X0.DE
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 40.37%
- 6M
- 42.72%
- 1Y
- 67.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ9.DE iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF | -8.56% | 15.30% | 20.91% | -5.42% |
84X0.DE iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc | 40.37% | 19.85% | 9.62% | 7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ9.DE and 84X0.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ9.DE
84X0.DE
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQ9.DE | 84X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.64 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 5.88 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 21.92 | -22.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQ9.DE | 84X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | 3.52 | -3.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.77 | -1.76 |
Drawdowns
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ9.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.58%, which is greater than 84X0.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ9.DE and 84X0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ9.DE | 84X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.58% | -19.72% | -45.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.80% | -11.66% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.26% | -2.49% | -38.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.71% | -2.70% | -25.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 3.13% | +5.38% |
Volatility
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF (IQQ9.DE) is 7.44%, while iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that IQQ9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 84X0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ9.DE | 84X0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 8.41% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 16.93% | -3.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 19.46% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.68% | 17.11% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 17.11% | +8.37% |
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ9.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than 84X0.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ9.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQ9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while 84X0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84X0.DE iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQ9.DE iShares BIC 50 UCITS ETF | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.75% | 2.66% | 3.70% | 1.62% | 1.51% | 2.03% | 3.03% | 1.99% | 1.83% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQ9.DE and 84X0.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 84X0.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
84X0.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQ9.DE.
IQQ9.DE tracks FTSE BIC 50 Net of Tax Index, while 84X0.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQ9.DE and 0.18% for 84X0.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQ9.DE and 84X0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer