PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQ6.DE achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly higher than ESAD.DE's 7.67% return.


IQQ6.DE

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
8.43%
6M
8.59%
1Y
9.26%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
3.38%

ESAD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
7.67%
6M
7.12%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IQQ6.DE
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF
8.43%-2.51%5.91%6.19%-16.80%
ESAD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation
7.67%-3.81%3.54%7.64%-19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQ6.DE and ESAD.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.93

The correlation between IQQ6.DE and ESAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQ6.DE
IQQ6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IQQ6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAD.DE
ESAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQ6.DEESAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.12

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

0.90

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.63

2.70

+0.93

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQ6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQ6.DE and ESAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQ6.DEESAD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.63

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.12

+0.34

Drawdowns

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ6.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.50%, which is greater than ESAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ6.DE and ESAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQ6.DEESAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.50%

-30.37%

-36.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-8.26%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-17.22%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-11.52%

+5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-17.56%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.75%

-0.21%

Volatility

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ6.DE) is 2.78%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that IQQ6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQ6.DEESAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.98%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

9.07%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

11.74%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

14.78%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.36%

14.78%

+1.58%

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ6.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAD.DE's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQ6.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQ6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, while ESAD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESAD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQ6.DE
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF
3.51%3.61%3.37%3.39%3.91%2.51%3.58%3.24%4.53%3.49%3.45%3.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IQQ6.DE and ESAD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ESAD.DE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQ6.DE.

IQQ6.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Dividend+, while ESAD.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IQQ6.DE and 0.41% for ESAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ6.DE and ESAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer