IQQ vs. QYLG
IQQ (iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - IQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while QYLG tracks the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. IQQ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.
Performance
IQQ vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IQQ
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QYLG
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 14.48%
- YTD
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.00M | $35.28M | $35.28M | |
| $1.61M | $1.47M | $1.34M |
IQQ vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | -0.53% |
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQ and QYLG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQ vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank
IQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QYLG
IQQ vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQ | QYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.14 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQ vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and QYLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQ | QYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -29.98% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -1.85% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -6.31% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.30% | — |
Volatility
IQQ vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQ | QYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.88% | 15.05% | +10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 18.41% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 18.09% | +7.79% |
IQQ vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQ vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison
IQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQ iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 17.10% | 17.93% | 25.27% | 5.43% | 6.91% | 10.15% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IQQ and QYLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLG.
QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 17.10%, compared with 0.00% for IQQ.
IQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.60% for QYLG.
Find the right allocation for IQQ and QYLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer