PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQ vs. QTOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQ vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IQQ

1D
0.61%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

QTOP

1D
0.76%
1M
-3.71%
6M
10.80%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
23.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.72M$37.50M$37.50M
$6.40M$5.80M$7.08M

IQQ vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IQQ and QTOP is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2026

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQ vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IQQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QTOP
QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IQQ vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF (IQQ) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IQQQTOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

IQQ vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IQQ vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQ drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, smaller than the maximum QTOP drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQ and QTOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQQTOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-23.28%

+14.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.21%

-8.69%

+3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-3.93%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

Volatility

IQQ vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQQTOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

21.39%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

23.79%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

23.79%

-0.76%

IQQ vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IQQ vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

IQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024
IQQ
iShares Nasdaq 100 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTOP
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
0.35%0.38%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, IQQ and QTOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IQQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.

QTOP has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for IQQ.

IQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IQQ and 0.20% for QTOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQ and QTOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer